Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Canopy Growth USA, LLC v. Go Farm Hemp, LLC et al
as 6:2019cv06747
Defendant:
Go Farm Hemp, LLC, Paul Smith and Joseph Sager
Plaintiff:
Canopy Growth USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Go Farm Hemp LLC v. Canopy Growth USA LLC
as 1:2019cv01370
Defendant:
Canopy Growth USA LLC and Canopy Growth USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Go Farm Hemp LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strange v. Slick Innovations, LLC et al
as 6:2018cv06635
Defendant:
Slick Innovations, LLC and Bistro to Go, LLC
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Woodward et al v. Kaboom of Rochester NY, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv06632
Plaintiff:
Kaylee Woodward and Sara Cotto
Defendant:
Kaboom of Rochester NY, Inc., Max To Go, Inc., Max Of Eastman Place, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dombrowski et al v. Quality Steel & Aluminum Products, Inc., d/b/a Dump & Go et al
as 1:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Robert W Dombrowski and Jane Dombrowski
Defendant:
Quality Steel & Aluminum Products, Inc., d/b/a Dump & Go , Johnson Controls, Inc. , Interstate Battery System International, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Quality Steel & Aluminum Products, Inc., d/b/a Dump & Go
Cross_defendant:
Interstate Battery Franchising & Development, Inc., Interstate Battery System International, Inc., Interstate Battery System of America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Three Recreational Vehicles Consisting of: One 2002 Ez-Go Golf Cart, Model H402, Vin: 1516347, One Carbide Go-Kart, Model 7150L-09, Vin: ASW-7022863, and One Redaction 150 Go-Kart, Engine: 7TJPX150150
as 1:2009cv01123
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Three Recreational Vehicles Consisting of: One 2002 Ez-Go Golf Cart, Model H402, Vin: 1516347, One Carbide Go-Kart, Model 7150L-09, Vin: ASW-7022863, and One Redaction 150 Go-Kart, Engine: 7TJPX150150
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
