Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Alvarez Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06033
Plaintiff:
Natalie J. Alvarez Hernandez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06523
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00868
Plaintiff:
Isaac C Hernandez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hernandez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rech v. Roth et al
as 6:2022cv06299
Plaintiff:
Michael Rech
Defendant:
Alan Roth, Scott Ashlaw, Jeffrey Caraher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cayuga Nation v. Parker et al
as 6:2022cv06074
Plaintiff:
Cayuga Nation
Defendant:
Dustin Parker, Nora Weber, Jose Verdugo, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hernandez v. Sawicki et al
as 1:2021cv01235
Plaintiff:
Robinson Hernandez
Defendant:
Richard D Sawicki, Patricia Sawicki, Daniel T Sawicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Hernandez Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01212
Plaintiff:
Damaris Hernandez Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Josey v. Hernandez et al
as 6:2021cv06674
Plaintiff:
Derek Josey
Defendant:
Sgt. Hernandez, Officer Ramadan, CO John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
