Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2018mc00116
Plaintiff:
Linda Goldenhar, Beth Hutton, Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute and others
Defendant:
Larry Obhof, Ryan Smith and Jon Husted
Intervenor:
Dave Joyce, Robert F, Bodi, Bill Johnson and others
Petitioner:
Armond D Budish and Christopher Glassburn
City of Barberton et al v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., et al
as 1:2018op45767
Plaintiff:
Irving B. Sugerman, Brad Bryan, Valley Fire District and others
Defendant:
Anda, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC, Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Primus v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission Agency (Akron) et al
as 5:2018cv00129
Plaintiff:
Sharyll Primus
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission Agency (Akron), Tameka Brooks, Brad Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cunningham v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission et al
as 5:2018cv00132
Plaintiff:
Paul Cunningham
Defendant:
Ohio Civil Rights Commission, Tameka Brooks, Brad Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Russo
as 1:2015mc00004
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Brad A. Russo
Family Health Chiropractic, Inc. v. Biomedx Marketing, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
Family Health Chiropractic, Inc.
Defendant:
Biomedx Marketing, LLC, Seminar Builders, Inc., Brad Mitchell Enterprises and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
United States of America v. Swicegood
as 3:2012mc00120
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Brad Swicegood
Makula v. Credit Smart, LLC
as 1:2012cv01177
Plaintiff:
Brad Makula
Defendant:
Credit Smart, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
