Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lamm et al v. Hall et al
as 5:2022cv01961
Plaintiff:
Megan K. Lamm and Haley M. Lamm
Defendant:
Judge Rosemarie A. Hall, Guardian ad Litem Nikki L. Reed, Attorney Susan J. Lax and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson v. Apple et al
as 5:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
Heaven Jackson
Defendant:
Apple, Verizon, Steak & Shake and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nice et al v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2021cv01887
Plaintiff:
Joseph Nice and Metro ACC LLC
Defendant:
City of Akron, Daniel Horrigan, Kenneth Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gemuenden v. Scott et al
as 5:2021cv00363
Defendant:
Joanna Kelley, Young Explorers Of Streetsboro, LLC, Barry Y Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Whitney Gemuenden
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2018mc00116
Plaintiff:
Linda Goldenhar, Beth Hutton, Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute and others
Defendant:
Larry Obhof, Ryan Smith and Jon Husted
Intervenor:
Dave Joyce, Robert F, Bodi, Bill Johnson and others
Petitioner:
Armond D Budish and Christopher Glassburn
Smith v. Sandusky Newspapers, Inc., et al
as 3:2017cv01135
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith
Defendant:
City of Sandusky, John Powell, Sandusky Newspapers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Chatlain et al v. Keystone RV Company et al
as 3:2017cv00259
Plaintiff:
Duane Chatlain and Linda Chatlain
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company and Youngs RV Centers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
