Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Botos et al v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 129 et al
as 1:2009cv00672
Plaintiff:
James Botos and Denise Botos
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 129, Trustees of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 129 Pension Fund, Trustees Of The International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Local Union No. 129 Health And Welfare Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Hettle v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv02256
Plaintiff:
Charles B Hettle and Charles B Hettle
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Musheno v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc et al
as 1:2008cv02131
Plaintiff:
Clyde Musheno and Clyde Musheno
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc, John Doe Entity 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hribar et al v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01728
Plaintiff:
Coletta L Hribar and Victor M Hribar
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bonafield v. Guidant Corporation
as 1:2008cv00869
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Corporation and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Brenda Bonafield
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Rothstein v. Steinberg, et al
as 5:2008cv00673
Plaintiff:
Lani Rothstein and Lani Rothstein
Defendant:
Sharon Rothstein Steinberg, David Steinberg, Bryan Schefman and others
Counter-Claimant:
David Steinberg
Counter-Defendant:
Lani Rothstein and Lani Rothstein
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bayse v. Swift Transportation
as 1:2007cv00536
Plaintiff:
John Bayse and John Bayse
Defendant:
Swift Transportation, Swift Transportation, Swift Transportation Co., Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
