Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Dietl et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co., et al
as 4:2018cv02186
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co. and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Robert Dietl and James Dietl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dinsio v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 5:2016cv00388
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Plaintiff:
Bert Dinsio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
Marie T. Lopez
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcellino et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 1:2012cv00398
Plaintiff:
Giancarlo Marcellino and Karen Marcellino
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Sears Holdings Corporation , Sears Holdings Management Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Velazquez et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 1:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
Rosa Velazquez and Israel Velazquez
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co. , John Doe 1-5 and John Doe 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. K-Mart Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv02127
Plaintiff:
Greta G. Davis
Defendant:
K-Mart Corporation and Sears Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
as 1:1988cv03885
Plaintiff:
Delores Holmes
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kreis v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jessica Kreis
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears Roebuck and Co., KCD IP LLC dba Craftsman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gray v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2008cv00671
Plaintiff:
Evangeline Gray
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lanham v. Eaton Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv10000
Plaintiff:
Duane Lanham, Duane Lanham, Linda Lanham and others
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation, General Motors Corporation, Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
