Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 80,435
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by filed date
Allen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02061
Plaintiff: Richard Lawrence Allen, Jr.
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Snow v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02049
Plaintiff: Joyce A. Snow
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jindal v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02050
Plaintiff: Hitesh Jindal
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rinehart v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02053
Plaintiff: Dwayne Rinehart
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burge v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02055
Plaintiff: Darcel D. Burge
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02059
Plaintiff: Lynn E. Jones
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02058
Plaintiff: Kurt Walker
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02045
Plaintiff: Robert Moore
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02052
Plaintiff: Dennis James
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02057
Plaintiff: Tamica S Moore
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?