Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Morgan et al v. Washita Valley Enterprises Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04068
Plaintiff:
Mr. Paul E Morgan and Paul E Morgan
Defendant:
Anita Morgan, Washita Valley Enterprises, Inc., Ascent Resources - Utica, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Berent v. Impex, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Berent
Defendant:
Impex, Inc., Chi Hsin Impex, Inc. and John Doe Corporation #1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Berent v. Impex, Inc.
as 2:2022cv03737
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Berent
Defendant:
Impex, Inc., Chi Shin Impex, Inc., John Doe Corporation #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Vining v. Ninebot U.S., Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03105
Plaintiff:
john vining, John K. Vining and Linda Vining
Defendant:
Ninebot U.S., Inc., Segway, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Howell et al v. Groupon, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02377
Plaintiff:
Cecil E. Howell and Debra L. Howell
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc., Fastbuy Inc., State of Ohio, Bureau of Workers' Compensation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Richardson et al v. Otis Elevator Company
as 2:2016cv00538
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company , John Doe Corporation, John Doe Agent 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Regina Richardson and John Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore et al v. Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02616
Plaintiff:
Myra Moore and Walter Moore
Defendant:
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. , John Doe Corporations #1-5, John Doe Business Entities 1 thru 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed et al v. Zimmer US, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00975
Plaintiff:
Timothy Reed and Jeryl Reed
Defendant:
Zimmer US, Inc. , Zimmer, Inc. , Zimmer GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
