Cases 31 - 40 of 374
Mikhail v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv02703
Plaintiff:
Amgad S. Mikhail
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryski v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv01929
Plaintiff:
Tova Bryski and Miriam Amselem
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Nixon v. WBH Cincinnati LLC
as 2:2022cv02481
Plaintiff:
Melanise Nixon
Defendant:
WBH Cincinnati LLC, Franklin County Probait Ct and Franklin County Office on Aging
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Owens v. Jameson et al
as 2:2022cv02001
Plaintiff:
Jordan Owens, r
Defendant:
Michael Jameson, Willis Law Firm LLC and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bernsee et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv02015
Plaintiff:
Norma Bernsee, Abby Nelson and Shirley Thiele
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Superior Logistics LLC v. Ace Funding Source LLC
as 2:2022cv02329
Plaintiff:
Superior Logistics Ohio LLC
Defendant:
Ace Funding Source LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Chang v. Silvani et al
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Charles Chang
Defendant:
Mary Silvani, John Silvani and Clifford Q. Cabansag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Toporek v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01927
Plaintiff:
Michael Toporek
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Aviles et al v. Proctor & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01950
Plaintiff:
Eileen Aviles, Shelby Cooper, Tanya Cooper and others
Defendant:
Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lyle v. Procter & Gamble Company
as 2:2022cv01925
Plaintiff:
Reese Lyle
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
