Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Brown-Austin v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Brown-Austin
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Doug Fender, Deputy Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Adams County Board of County Commissioners et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 2:2021cv05217
Plaintiff:
Adams County Board of County Commissioners, Athens County Board of County Commissioners, Belmont County Board of County Commissioners and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Brown County Board of County Commissioners v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00664
Plaintiff:
Brown County Board of County Commissioners
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Aaron et al v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00301
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frieda Aaron , Katrina Allen , Rebecca Applegate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Grubbs et al v. Sheakley et al
as 1:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
Linda Grubbs , Tri-Serve, LTD , Tri-Serve #1, LLC and others
Defendant:
Sheakley Group, Inc. , Sheakley Benefit Plans Agency, Inc , Sheakley HR, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Aaron et al v. Durrani et al
as 1:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
Frieda Aaron , Katrina Allen , Sherri Lynn Allen and others
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani , Center For Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. , West Chester Medical Center, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gill et al v. U.S. Bank, National Assn. et al
as 1:2011cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael Gill and Heather Heitmeyer
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, National Assn. , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , China Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
