Cases 21 - 30 of 31
In re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2018md02846
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation, C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pauline R Currey, Gerald Lane, Abraham Furleiter and others
Interested Party:
David Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Lane v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00164
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lane
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrier v. FreethoughtBlogs Network et al
as 2:2016cv00906
Plaintiff:
Richard Carrier
Defendant:
FreethoughtBlogs Network, Paul Z. Myers, PH.D., The Orbit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01603
Plaintiff:
Tommy N. Lane, Sr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01503
Plaintiff:
Barbara E. Lane
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westmoreland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02132
Plaintiff:
Gary Lane Westmoreland
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Geary et al v. Liberty Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00764
Plaintiff:
Gene Geary , Ricky Lane , Susan Lane and others
Defendant:
Liberty Industries, Inc. and Unifirst Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potts v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01115
Plaintiff:
David Lane Potts
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv01236
Plaintiff:
Richard Lane
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Renoir-Large et al v. Lane
as 2:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Renoir-Large, David R Ransbottom and Sebastien C Large
Defendant:
Norma Darwin Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
