Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Bailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02068
Plaintiff:
Roger Lloyd Bailey
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Theodore Lloyd Miller
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haggy v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02394
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Allen Haggy
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Holcomb v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02041
Plaintiff:
Donald Lloyd Holcomb
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01513
Plaintiff:
Lloyd E. McDonald, Jr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01171
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Oliver Jones
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Earl Keith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Everetts v. Waid et al
as 2:2012cv00003
Defendant:
Abdirazak M. Waid and Fardoussa A. Bouth
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Everetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Justice v. Walline et al
as 2:2009cv00811
Plaintiff:
Lloyd A Justice
Defendant:
Michael C Walline, Jennifer Ruff, Scott Ruff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Coyle v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00373
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Ray Coyle and Lloyd Ray Coyle
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc, Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co. and Medtronic International Technology Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
