Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Thompson v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv03191
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Plaintiff:
Lasonya Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv02347
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Melinda Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02262
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lisa Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01213
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Danielle Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson-Mitchell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00653
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Thompson-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Nona et al
as 1:2020cv01016
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Medicaid, Uber Technologies, Inc. and William Nona
Plaintiff:
Brittany Thompson
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Thompson v. Nona et al
as 1:2020cv01017
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Medicaid, Uber Technologies, Inc. and William Nona
Plaintiff:
Brittany Thompson
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Thompson v. Nona et al
as 1:2020oe01016
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Medicaid, Uber Technologies, Inc. and William Nona
Plaintiff:
Brittany Thompson
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Thompson v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv06109
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Jessica Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv06110
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Jessica Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
