Cases 1 - 10 of 145
Watts v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02863
Plaintiff:
Matthew Watts
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Matthews et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02885
Plaintiff:
Daniel Matthews and Matthews Kathy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02752
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kopp v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02192
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kopp
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vlcek et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01293
Plaintiff:
Matthew Vlcek and Debra Kay Vlcek
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robertson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01211
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robertson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sendler v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sendler
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Borchers v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Matthew Borchers
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mink et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Mink and Alla Mink
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Malnar v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Matthew Malnar
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
