Cases 91 - 100 of 81,186
Lahlum v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02647
Plaintiff:
Arne N. Lahlum
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kent-Parcell v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02650
Plaintiff:
Kelly Kent-Parcell
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Law v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02648
Plaintiff:
Andrew Law, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Honeychuck et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02649
Plaintiff:
Debra D. Honeychuck and Martin Honeychuck
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leca v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02652
Plaintiff:
Henry Leca
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Manis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02653
Plaintiff:
Michael Manis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maxwell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02654
Plaintiff:
Timothy Maxwell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harrington v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02655
Plaintiff:
Michelle Harrington
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wheeler v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02656
Plaintiff:
Kelly Wheeler
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Christenberry et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02657
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Christenberry and Charles Christenberry
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
