Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Rivera v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rivera
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Varela Rivera et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01520
Plaintiff:
Carmen R. Varela Rivera and Angel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doyle v. Luxottica of America, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00908
Plaintiff:
Michael Doyle
Defendant:
Luxottica of America, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Phillip Gervais, Jessie Crockett, Donna Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rivera v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04452
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Rivera
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rivera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv04475
Plaintiff:
Alicia Rivera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rivera v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03078
Plaintiff:
Della M. Rivera
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Oviedo v. Hernandez Rivera
as 1:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Humberto Gomez Oviedo
Defendant:
Karolina Michelle Hernandez Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rivera v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01415
Plaintiff:
Clara Rivera
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Saulnette Rivera
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05898
Plaintiff:
Rosa Rivera
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
