Cases 1 - 10 of 249
Collins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02943
Plaintiff:
Amanda Collins
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stoner v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02593
Plaintiff:
Amanda Stoner
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sczygelski v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02347
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Sczygelski
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moseley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02141
Plaintiff:
Amanda Moseley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stoltz v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02075
Plaintiff:
Amanda Stoltz
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01742
Plaintiff:
Amanda Robinson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Banks v. Geodis Logistics, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Michael Banks
Defendant:
Geodis Logistics, LLC, Anthony Sweeney, Ryan Hart and others
Amicus Curiae:
Ohio Employment Lawyers Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Stephens v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Amanda Stephens
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
George v. The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Amanda George
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gilbert v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Amanda Nicole Gilbert
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
