Cases 1 - 10 of 185
Sottile v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01939
Plaintiff:
Betty Sottile
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yang et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Damon Yang and Betty Yang
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yeagley v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Betty Yeagley
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fields v. CareSource Management Services LLC
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Betty Jo Fields
Defendant:
CareSource Management Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lewallen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04215
Plaintiff:
Betty Lewallen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leslie v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 3:2023cv00335
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc, Sanofi S.A, Aventis Pharma S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Betty Leslie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Serrano v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02204
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Serrano
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McElwee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00367
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Betty Jo McElwee
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Martin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01897
Plaintiff:
Betty Martin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hooper v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01687
Plaintiff:
Betty Hooper
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
