Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 36,640
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Iwasaki v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03287
Plaintiff: Thomas Iwasaki
Defendant: CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roberts v. AirStream, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff: Josh Roberts
Defendant: Airstream Caravans, Inc. and Airstream, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gallegos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03284
Plaintiff: Patricia Gallegos
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Noland v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03262
Plaintiff: Earl Noland
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Griffis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03296
Plaintiff: Shawn Griffis
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03275
Plaintiff: Edwin Hall
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fitzgerald v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03278
Plaintiff: Billy Fitzgerald
Defendant: CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frazier v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03279
Plaintiff: Joe Frazier
Defendant: CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Graves v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03280
Plaintiff: Marvin Graves
Defendant: CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Griffin v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03281
Plaintiff: Arnold Griffin
Defendant: CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?