Cases 1 - 10 of 2,859
Thompson v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Amanda R. Thompson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Queen v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Gloria Leanna Queen
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McLeran v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jae Lynn McLeran
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pearson v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Amy Pearson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cain v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Jimmy R. Cain, Jr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Capps v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Carl Joseph Capps
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Halderman v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
James Lee Halderman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Snow v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Andrea Paige Snow
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pearce v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Lynn Pearce
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Masters v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ray Masters
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
