Cases 21 - 30 of 2,901
Bagwell v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
James R. Bagwell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Knight v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00245
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Rikki Dyan Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Murillo v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00234
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Vickie Fay Cofer Murillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hensley v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00236
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Shellene Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Underwood v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00231
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jeana S. Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Neiley v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00228
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Robbie L. Neiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rundle v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00224
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Michelle Lynn Rundle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Swims v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00222
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Robert Tyrell Swims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Henry v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00217
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Tracey Marie Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thompson v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00220
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
William Clyde Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
