Cases 51 - 60 of 1,183
Vanwoudenberg v. Harvanek
as 4:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
Edward John Vanwoudenberg
Respondent:
Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Rourke v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00290
Petitioner:
Bryan Christopher O'Rourke
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alberty v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
Farron Whitney Alberty
Respondent:
United States of America, William Rankins and Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lolar v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00269
Petitioner:
Marcus E Lolar
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Barteaux
as 4:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
Cherokee Nation
Defendant:
T Luke Barteaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Malone v. Regalado
as 4:2023cv00231
Petitioner:
Carlos C. Malone and Carlos C Malone
Respondent:
Sheriff Vic Regalado and Vic Regalado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Brown
as 4:2023cv00233
Petitioner:
Orlando Jordan
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Watkins v. Bridges
as 4:2023cv00186
Petitioner:
Daniel Cody Watkins
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayes v. Buss
as 4:2023cv00176
Petitioner:
Lawrence Mayes and Lawrence L Mayes
Respondent:
Janet Dowling and David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sitsler v. Buss
as 4:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Danny Joe Sitsler
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
