Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Florentino v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00514
Petitioner:
Bautista Sanchez Florentino and Florentino Bautista-Sanchez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Alberty v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
Farron Whitney Alberty
Respondent:
United States of America, William Rankins and Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelso v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00041
Plaintiff:
John Donald Kelso
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cangro v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00358
Petitioner:
James Casady Cangro
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Basil v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv00230
Plaintiff:
Habakuk M Basil
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fristoe v. United States of America
as 4:2011cv00546
Petitioner:
Herman Leroy Fristoe
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Warden et al
as 4:2011cv00264
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Williams
Respondent:
Warden, Tulsa County District Court, Brad Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Judd v. United States of America
as 4:2010cv00203
Petitioner:
Keith Russell Judd
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nelson v. United States of America
as 4:2010cv00140
Petitioner:
Terrance Lamont Nelson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bell v. United States of America et al
as 4:2007cv00687
Petitioner:
James Dalton Bell
Respondent:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
