Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Ellis v. Tulsa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
Timothy Shane Ellis
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriff's Office, David L. Moss Criminal Justice Center and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Tulsa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2017cv00271
Petitioner:
John Edgar Williams, III
Respondent:
Tulsa County Sheriff's Office and Kathleen Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabelt v. Krewson et al
as 4:2017cv00213
Plaintiff:
Garrett Davis Gabelt
Defendant:
Jesse Krewson and Sheriff Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Reed et al
as 4:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
Richard A Smith
Defendant:
Mike Reed, Mitch Goodman, Mayes County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagnell v. Floyd et al
as 4:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
Nathan Daniel Bagnell
Defendant:
Sheriff Floyd and Theresa Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Tulsa County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
John Edgar Williams, III
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Winfield et al
as 4:2016cv00734
Plaintiff:
Jonel Lewis
Defendant:
Detention Officer Winfield, Detention Officer Anderson and Tulsa County Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguirre v. Deputy Sheriff Cherry et al
as 4:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
Rodney Mark Aguirre
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Cherry and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aliff v. Roberts et al
as 4:2016cv00348
Plaintiff:
Paul Leslie Aliff, Jr
Defendant:
Celia Roberts, Tulsa Police Department and Tulsa Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hazelwood v. Creek County Sheriff et al
as 4:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gene Hazelwood
Defendant:
Creek County Sheriff, Creek County Justice Center, CCJC Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
