Cases 61 - 70 of 177
Hendrick v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2018cv00596
Petitioner:
Cameron Jerel Hendrick
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stiltner v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2018cv00576
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Stiltner
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County, Kenny Elmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGill v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2018cv00446
Petitioner:
Tracy Joevaun McGill
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCurley v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2018cv00429
Petitioner:
Kenneth K McCurley
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, James Yates and Joe Allbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Custard v. Harding et al
as 4:2018cv00407
Respondent:
Tammy Cartwright, State of Oklahoma, Prison Electrical Crew Supervisor and others
Petitioner:
Bob Allen Custard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
Brande L Samuels
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Bar Association City of Tulsa, Tulsa County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardwell v. State of Oklahoma, The
as 4:2018cv00199
Petitioner:
Christopher A Cardwell
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Bryant
as 4:2018cv00123
Petitioner:
Joshua Tyrone Thomas
Respondent:
Jason Bryant and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniels v. Bryant et al
as 4:2018cv00113
Petitioner:
Terrance Ivan Daniels
Respondent:
Jason Bryant and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padillow v. State of Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2018cv00122
Petitioner:
Earnest Eugene Padillow
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, The and Joe Allbaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
