Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cases 81 - 90 of 2,504
Jackson v. Hershberger et al
as 4:2023cv00439
Plaintiff: Jesse Michael Wayne Jackson and Artemis Adams Anderson Andersen
Defendant: Edwin Hershberger, Mike Reed, Damon Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wanjiku v. Boggess
as 4:2023cv00363
Petitioner: Erick Wanjiku
Respondent: Gary Boggess and Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. USA
as 4:2023cv00454
Petitioner: Amanda Lyn Walker
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
White v. Dowling
as 4:2023cv00423
Petitioner: Steve A White
Respondent: Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foy v. Drummond et al
as 4:2023cv00407
Petitioner: Clint Patrick Foy
Respondent: Gentner Drummond and Steven Kunzweiler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Buss
as 4:2023cv00355
Petitioner: Bobby Ray Parker
Respondent: David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Etuk v. USA
as 4:2023cv00430
Petitioner: Ibanga Etuk
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nunley v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00380
Petitioner: Eugene Todd Nunley
Respondent: Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamett v. USA
as 4:2023cv00428
Petitioner: Randy Alan Hamett
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Melson v. Rankins We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00338
Petitioner: Brian Lee Melson
Respondent: William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?