Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,268
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Happy Monk LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Defendant: Chaoran Tang, Happy Monk LLC doing business as Happy Monk Club and Scott Tang
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00213
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00181
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Caloto v. Paycom Software, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff: Chris H. Caloto
Defendant: Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig E. Boelte
Petitioner: Calvin E Mein
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00180
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00085
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Clark et al v. Stockton et al
as 5:2023cv01147
Plaintiff: Jason Clark and Jenifer Clark
Defendant: James Stockton, Teresa Stockton, Steve Ambrose and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Schoenrock v. Paycom Software Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff: Corey Schoenrock
Defendant: Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig Boelte
Petitioner: Calvin E Mein
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01168
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Williams et al v. Rhino Guard LLC
as 5:2023cv01142
Plaintiff: Christine Williams
Defendant: Rhino Guard LLC doing business as Luxestone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?