Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Skurkey v. Daniel et al
as 5:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
John V Skurkey
Defendant:
William Daniel, Paul E Quigley and Anne Thomas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Newell et al v. Gibson and Reynolds PC et al
as 5:2018cv01028
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Newell and Terry Newell
Defendant:
Steven Lane Schollenbarger, James Reynolds and Gibson and Reynolds PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Copeland v. Lawrence et al
as 5:2017cv00603
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dwain Copeland
Defendant:
Anne Lawrence , Carla D Haddard, Mary B Stanley Renouf and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
Mahoney-Killian Inc et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corp et al
as 5:2016cv00358
Plaintiff:
Mahoney-Killian Inc , Edward Clark Inc and Cynthia Ann Schoeppel
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corp, Sandridge Energy Inc, Tom L Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Watts
as 5:2014cv00092
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kristy Ann Watts
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America v. Harvey
as 5:2013cv00903
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carolyn Ann Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierce v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00713
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Pierce
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. James
as 5:2012cv00668
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Selissa Ann James
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Chechele v. Ward et al
as 5:2010cv01286
Plaintiff:
Donna Ann Gabriele Chechele
Defendant:
Tom L Ward and Sandridge Energy Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
