Cases 141 - 150 of 6,338
Maldonado v. USA
as 5:2024cv00048
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joseph Allen Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Morgan v. Biden
as 5:2023cv01109
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gaines v. Spitner et al
as 5:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Trevon D. Gaines
Defendant:
Mrs. Spitner, Mrs. Birdshead, Mr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Stephens County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Jacob Kelly
Defendant:
Stephens County Jail, Heather LNU, Sean LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCay v. Sipes et al
as 5:2023cv01102
Defendant:
B Sipes, Braniy, Ms Lt. Earnest and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCay, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zodoq-El v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv01088
Petitioner:
Nanya Maluk Zodoq-El
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, Department of Corrections and Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrington v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2023cv01087
Petitioner:
Derrek E Arrington
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
State of Oklahoma v. Thompson
as 5:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Donell Thompson, Jr. corp. sole doing business as Donell Jr Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Sherfield et al v. Diaz et al
as 5:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Sherfield, Sr, Leslie R Loyd, Taufano CT Guyton and others
Defendant:
FNU Diaz, FNU Leath and Mike Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chester v. Minst et al
as 5:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
Allie Thomas Chester
Defendant:
Ray Minst, Stacy Randolph, Abel Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
