Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Johnson v. Stephens et al
as 5:2014cv01362
Plaintiff:
Maurice Morlee Johnson
Defendant:
Richard Stephens, Logan County Jail, Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tubbs v. Wilkinson
as 5:2014cv01282
Petitioner:
Maurice Tubbs
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks v. Fitzgerald et al
as 5:2014cv01163
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Rich Fitzgerald, Harper, Landya McCafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sex Offender Registration et al
as 5:2014cv00525
Petitioner:
Maurice M Johnson
Respondent:
Sex Offender Registration and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Pattion et al
as 5:2014cv00528
Plaintiff:
Maurice M Johnson
Defendant:
Robert Pattion and Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Oklahoma County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2014cv00496
Petitioner:
Maurice M Johnson
Respondent:
Oklahoma County Sheriff's Department and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2013cv01363
Plaintiff:
Maurice Ray Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wiesendanger v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2013cv00761
Plaintiff:
Maurice Wiesendanger
Defendant:
Ida K Mitchell and FAF Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Cleveland v. Martin et al
as 5:2013cv00562
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cleveland
Defendant:
Terry Martin, Maurice Warrior, Glenn Waldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Mack Maurice Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
