Cases 21 - 30 of 886
Williams v. Greer et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Shaquille O Williams
Defendant:
FNU Greer, FNU LNU and FNU Timms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phipps v. Carillo et al
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
William R Phipps
Defendant:
Jesus Fonseco Carillo, Coliseo Trucking Inc, Knight Specialty InsuranceCo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jones v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
William D Jones
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 5:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
Kizzy Williams
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Patrick Delane Williams
Defendant:
Jordan Blake Jones, Jace Gilly, Marcus Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff et al
as 5:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Donna R Brandt
Defendant:
Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, Terrace Dickerson, FNU Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Williams et al v. Rhino Guard LLC
as 5:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Christine Williams
Defendant:
Rhino Guard LLC doing business as Luxestone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Small v. Rankins
as 5:2023cv01127
Petitioner:
Vincent Harry Small
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
