Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cherry v. Capital One Bank USA NA
as 5:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cherry
Defendant:
Capital One Bank USA NA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cherry v. Comenity Capital Bank
as 5:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cherry
Defendant:
Comenity Capital Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cherry v. Credit First NA
as 5:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cherry
Defendant:
Credit First NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cherry v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2020cv01146
Plaintiff:
Arthur Clinton Cherry
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cherry v. Whitten
as 5:2020cv00677
Petitioner:
Mario Donsheau Cherry
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Day-Staley v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp et al
as 5:2015cv00903
Plaintiff:
Cherrie Day-Staley
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Day-Staley v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp et al
as 5:2015cv00569
Plaintiff:
Cherrie Day-Staley
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Austin et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv00391
Plaintiff:
Arthur Austin , Charles Burkes , Ethel Caldwell and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation , Glaxosmithkline LLC , Aryan Kadivar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kinzer et al v. Remington Arms Company Inc et al
as 5:2009cv01242
Plaintiff:
Jantz H Kinzer, Jantz H Kinzer, John W Cherry and others
Defendant:
Remington Arms Company Inc and Sporting Goods Properties Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Cherry v. Astrue
as 5:2009cv00419
Plaintiff:
Laurie A Cherry
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
