Tort Product Liability Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 88
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv02325
Plaintiff: STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and MABE CANADA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY v. SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv02096
Plaintiff: FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALONSO et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv02062
Plaintiff: JOSE ALONSO and MARTA ALONSO
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. QUIEN
as 2:2010cv00678
Plaintiff: DEBORAH A. ADAMS
Defendant: EMMANUAL QUIEN, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MOORE et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv04647
Plaintiff: GERALD MOORE, GERALD MOORE, GERALD MOORE and others
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BENEDICT et al v. SPRINGFIELD MALL POST OFFICE
as 2:2009cv00864
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
GREATER NEW YORK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. ELECTROLUX
as 2:2009cv00698
Plaintiff: GREATER NEW YORK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: ELECTROLUX
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SHADDEN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00382
Plaintiff: ICYLE SHADDEN
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Real Property None
RAMIREZ v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00389
Plaintiff: LUCY RAMIREZ
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LICIAGA v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00391
Plaintiff: CARMEN LICIAGA
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?