Cases 101 - 110 of 193
REGUSTERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv02056
Plaintiff:
KENYELL REGUSTERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MOORE v. BYRNES
as 2:2017cv01324
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MOORE
Defendant:
KEVIN M. BYRNES and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JAMES-VELARDO et al v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2017cv01261
Plaintiff:
MARINA JAMES-VELARDO and CHRISTOPHER WALLACE
Defendant:
JOSEPH LEWIS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
CHILDS v. GLACCUM et al
as 2:2017cv01179
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CHILDS
Defendant:
BRYAN GLACCUM and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
HUNTER et al v. MJH RENOVATIONS et al
as 2:2017cv01078
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HUNTER
Defendant:
MJH RENOVATIONS, MATTHEW JAMES HUNTER and MICHAEL KROH
Thirdparty_defendant:
BRIAN VONA
Movant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MATTHEWS v. CHORNO et al
as 2:2017cv00744
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MATTHEWS
Defendant:
GABREIL J. CHORNO and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
MATTHEWS v. CHORNO et al
as 2:2017cv00483
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MATTHEWS
Defendant:
GABREIL J. CHORNO and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BRISTOL WEST INS. CO. v. RUFF et al
as 2:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
BRISTOL WEST INS. CO.
Defendant:
MALLORIE RUFF, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and CARMEN BELSTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DAMON et al v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv05869
Plaintiff:
KENDRA DAMON and MERCEDES DAMON
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
NOTTINGHAM et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv05119
Plaintiff:
NATASHA NOTTINGHAM and MALIK NOTTINGHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
