Cases 1 - 10 of 32
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67788
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. JONES
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv67576
Plaintiff:
ALAN W. JONES and SANDRA R. JONES
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
as 5:2011cv45729
Plaintiff:
CASEY R. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44610
Plaintiff:
FLOYD R. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43423
Plaintiff:
RAE R. JONES, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JONES et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65061
Plaintiff:
ROY VANDO JONES and ELIZABETH R JONES
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65951
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. JONES and ANNIE PEARL JONES
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60459
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. JONES and BETTY JEAN JONES
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , H.K. PORTER COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81853
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA JONES and CHARLES R. JONES
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41478
Plaintiff:
LLOYD R. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
