Cases 61 - 70 of 756
LITTLE v. ECCLESIASTICAL MOORS et al
as 2:2022cv00843
Plaintiff:
PARRIS LITTLE and JEAN ELIZABETH LLC
Defendant:
ECCLESIASTICAL MOORS, PRINCE MIKHAIL EL, PRINCE MICHAEL DAVID JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
needle v. T Rowe Price Group Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04786
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NEEDLE, MICHAEL NEEDLE, WILLIAM A. NEEDLE and others
Defendant:
T Rowe Price Group Inc., T Rowe Price Associates Inc., Edward Dosik and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
DAKIEVA v. VOLODYMYR KURYLO, et. al.
as 2:2022cv03177
Defendant:
VOLODYMYR KURYLO, VA LOGISTICS, INC, VOLODYA and others
Plaintiff:
ALTYNGUL DAKIEVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
PURNELL v. GOODLEAP, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02773
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN PURNELL
Defendant:
GOODLEAP, LLC, SUNRUN INC, VIVINT SOLAR, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
BRETTER et al v. PEYTON
as 2:2022cv02509
Plaintiff:
Beth Ann Bretter, James A Peyton and JAMES A. PEYTON, JR.
Defendant:
Karen F Peyton and KAREN F. PEYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
NEWTEK SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC v. TEXAS FIRST CAPITAL, INC.
as 5:2022cv02461
Plaintiff:
NEWTEK SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC
Defendant:
TEXAS FIRST CAPITAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
HINES v. CIDADEL BANK
as 2:2022cv01820
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEROY HINES
Defendant:
CIDADEL BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
RIAD v. DEY EQUINE VETERINARIANS, P.A. et al
as 2:2022cv02022
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RIAD
Defendant:
DEY EQUINE VETERINARIANS, P.A. and STEVEN DEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
CHEMALLOY COMPANY, LLC v. CITIBANK, N.A
as 2:2022cv01143
Plaintiff:
CHEMALLOY COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
