Cases 1 - 8 of 8
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS v. P. SANTOS CO., INC.
as 2:2022cv00613
Petitioner:
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Respondent:
P. SANTOS CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
SCANLAN v. AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC.
as 2:2018cv04040
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC. and AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMES P. SCANLAN
Petitioner:
AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
PEREZ v. LLOYD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01079
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
LLOYD INDUSTRIES, INC. and WILLIAM P. LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
CHAKO v. DONAHOE
as 5:2014cv03731
Plaintiff:
JACOB P. CHAKO
Defendant:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CARPENTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY et al v. PERRYMAN BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2010cv05477
Plaintiff:
CARPENTERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY , CARPENTERS PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY , CARPENTERS SAVINGS FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and others
Defendant:
PERRYMAN BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
KEIPER et al v. TAMA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
as 5:2009cv01100
Plaintiff:
BARBARA J. KEIPER, EDWARD YOST and ERNEST P. SENEFELD
Defendant:
TAMA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BENDER v. THE OPPENHEIMER GROUP, INC.
as 2:2008cv03822
Plaintiff:
SHAWN P. BENDER
Defendant:
THE OPPENHEIMER GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ThirdParty Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
