Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LUTRON ELECTRONICS CO., INC. v. LEETRONICS CORPORATION et al
as 5:2023cv03318
Plaintiff:
LUTRON ELECTRONICS CO., INC.
Defendant:
LEETRONICS CORPORATION, ELIRAN YADID and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
RETIREMENT MEDIA, INC. et al v. YESHIN et al
as 2:2020cv00926
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10 and NICHOLAS LEE YESHIN
Plaintiff:
RETIREMENT MEDIA, INC. and CRASH PROOF RETIREMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
FLIPSIDE WALLETS LLC v. THE BRAFMAN GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05356
Defendant:
THE BRAFMAN GROUP INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Plaintiff:
FLIPSIDE WALLETS LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
SHIFT4 PAYMENTS, LLC v. SMITH et al
as 5:2019cv00330
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, ERIC SMITH, ALLIANCE CONSULTANT GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SHIFT4 PAYMENTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LUKOIL NORTH AMERICA, LLC v. ATLANTIS PETROLEUM, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02104
Plaintiff:
LUKOIL NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Defendant:
ATLANTIS PETROLEUM, LLC , KENNETH C. MORRISON , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
JUST KIDSTUFF, INC. v. SNIPSNAP APP LCC et al
as 5:2013cv05983
Plaintiff:
JUST KIDSTUFF, INC.
Defendant:
SNIPSNAP APP LCC and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC. v. MOTTO et al
as 2:2010cv02795
Plaintiff:
ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC.
Defendant:
VINCENT MOTTO, UNKOWN WEBSITES 1-10, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
COACH, INC. et al v. LIN et al
as 2:2010cv01906
Plaintiff:
COACH, INC. and COACH SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
WAN ZHEN LIN, A 1 GIFT SHOP and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
NTP MARBLE, INC. v. JOHN DOES (1-10) et al
as 2:2009cv05783
Plaintiff:
NTP MARBLE, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES (1-10), JANE DOES (1-10) and DOE ENTITIES (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
