Cases 51 - 60 of 346
ELLIOTT v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05999
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
MELVENIA ELLIOTT
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROSE v. UNKOWN SOCIAL SECURITY AGENT et al
as 5:2019cv06018
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW C. LYNCH, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION MID-ATLANTIC PROGRAM SERVICE CENTER, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
BULLARD v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05969
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JAMES BULLARD, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROGERS v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05971
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ROGERS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BRAZINSKI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2019cv05938
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
NANCY L BRAZINSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCNAIR v. SAUL et al
as 5:2019cv05771
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL and SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
ANNE ELIZABETH MCNAIR and A.E.M.
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SHIRK v. BERRYHILL
as 5:2019cv05668
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SHIRK
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MCPHERSON v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05596
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE MCPHERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BURTON v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05526
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
ROBIN BURTON
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
STATON v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv05527
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STATON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
