Cases 11 - 20 of 145
Schweitzer et al v. Nevels et al
as 2:2023cv01556
Plaintiff:
Steven Schweitzer and William Scott Mero
Defendant:
James E Nevels and The Swarthmore Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
BERK v. ROTHMAN INSTITUTE ORTHOPEDIC FOUNDATION et al
as 2:2023cv01437
Plaintiff:
HAROLD R. BERK
Defendant:
ROTHMAN INSTITUTE ORTHOPEDIC FOUNDATION, RECONSTRUCTIVE ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES II, LLC., ROTHMAN ORTHO PA HOLDCO I., P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
LUCAS v. SAVANNA INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LUCAS
Defendant:
SAVANNA INC., STEVE SLOAN, MICHAEL WOLFEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
BROOKS et al v. HILLSTROM et al
as 2:2023cv00950
Plaintiff:
Alexander Brooks and Steven Maslanik
Defendant:
Seth Hillstrom and Anthony Spina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BETHLEHEM et al
as 5:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF BETHLEHEM, GLEN ADELSBERGER, LINDA BARTHOLOMEW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
WIND CREEK BETHLEHEM RETAIL, LLC v. LOVELL et al
as 5:2022cv04617
Plaintiff:
WIND CREEK BETHLEHEM RETAIL, LLC
Defendant:
STEVEN LOVELL and CHARMING CHARLIE MARKETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
SIDEWATER et al v. SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP
as 2:2022cv04088
Plaintiff:
STEVEN J SIDEWATER, SAMUEL I SIDEWATER and HERBERT T VEDERMAN
Defendant:
SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SCHABACKER et al v. FERENS
as 2:2022cv03778
Plaintiff:
MARCUS SCHABACKER and EMERGENCY CARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE doing business as ECRI
Defendant:
STEVEN FERENS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
