Cases 151 - 160 of 513
FATTAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv01092
Plaintiff:
CHAKA FATTAH, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. SAFT et al
as 2:2013cv07227
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MATTHEW LORD
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. SAFT and S & S HAT CO., LLC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. SAFT
as 2:2013cv07226
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MATTHEW LORD
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. SAFT
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. SAFT
as 2:2013cv07225
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MATTHEW LORD
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. SAFT
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SADLER
as 2:2013cv07207
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROBERT L. SADLER, III
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
MCILHENNY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2013cv06552
Plaintiff:
ELEANORE R. MCILHENNY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BASILE et al
as 5:2013cv06425
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PAUL F. BASILE and BARBARA B. BASILE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALI et al
as 2:2013cv05645
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
IMRANA MUHAMMAD ALI and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEIDNER et al
as 2:2013cv05356
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHELLE T. SEIDNER, ESTATE OF I. STEVEN LEVY, OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. HRONIS
as 5:2013cv05054
Defendant:
TAMMY HRONIS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and E. G. KOVATCH
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
