Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 121 - 130 of 204
HAMM v. THOMPSON REUTERS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01768
Plaintiff: PAUL J. HAMM, JR.
Defendant: THOMPSON REUTERS CORPORATION , WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BRUCE v. THOMPSON REUTERS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01769
Plaintiff: SAMANTHA BRUCE
Defendant: THOMPSON REUTERS CORPORATION , WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LASKE v. THOMPSON REUTERS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01770
Plaintiff: ROBERT B. LASKE
Defendant: THOMPSON REUTERS CORPORATION , WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KOENIG v. THOMPSON REUTER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01771
Plaintiff: ZACHARY KOENIG
Defendant: THOMPSON REUTER CORPORATION , WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01494
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
WRIGHT et al v. THOMPSON REUTERS CORPORATION et al Featured Case
as 2:2012cv00817
Plaintiff: JAMES E. WRIGHT, JR. and VICKI PIONTEK
Defendant: THOMPSON REUTERS CORPORATION , WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION , JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00711
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00710
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00649
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00650
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?