Cases 31 - 40 of 58
HIQUET et al v. LAW OFFICE OF HARRISON ROSS BYCK, P.C. et al
as 2:2013cv00642
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HIQUET and MELISSA HIQUET
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF HARRISON ROSS BYCK, P.C., LAW FIRM OF ALLAN C. SMITH, P.C. and CACH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ACKOUREY v. ROSS CREATIONS INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06728
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. ACKOUREY, JR.
Defendant:
ROSS CREATIONS INC. and KASH ROSS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK v. THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK et al
as 2:2012cv06259
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF H. FRED CLARK
Defendant:
THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK , TD BANK, N.A. , T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ROSS v. NATIONS RECOVERY CENTER, INC.
as 2:2012cv04609
Plaintiff:
SHARON A. ROSS
Defendant:
NATIONS RECOVERY CENTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ACKOUREY v. ANDRE LANI CUSTOM CLOTHIERS et al
as 2:2012cv01686
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. ACKOUREY, JR.
Defendant:
ANDRE LANI CUSTOM CLOTHIERS, ASHOK B. KHEMLANI, MOSANTI TAILORS and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
ALVAREZ v. LAW OFFICE OF HARRISON ROSS BYCK, P.C.
as 2:2012cv01294
Plaintiff:
GLORIA ALVAREZ
Defendant:
LAW OFFICE OF HARRISON ROSS BYCK, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROGERS v. HARRISON ROSS BYCK P.C.
as 2:2011cv07397
Defendant:
HARRISON ROSS BYCK P.C.
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SICA v. HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQ., P.C.
as 5:2011cv06630
Plaintiff:
ADRIANO SICA
Defendant:
HARRISON ROSS BYCK, ESQ., P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
