Cases 31 - 40 of 95
KAMENIK et al v. KELLY-GONZALEZ
as 5:2018cv03342
Plaintiff:
MIRO KAMENIK and COLLEN KAMENIK
Defendant:
ESQUIRE DIANE M. KELLY-GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02708
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HOUSER et al v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 5:2018cv02594
Plaintiff:
ALBERT HOUSER and KELLY HOUSER
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and SETERUS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
SINGH et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv02526
Plaintiff:
GAJADHAR SINGH and ROMA VELASQUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, JOHN F. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
KELLY v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03649
Plaintiff:
BILLY EARL KELLY
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, GATEWAY ONE LENDING & FINANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
THE PEOPLE OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF EAURIPIK, YAP STATE v. OSPREY UNDERWRITING AGENCY, LTD. et al
as 2:2017mc00099
Plaintiff:
THE PEOPLE OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF EAURIPIK, YAP STATE
Defendant:
OSPREY UNDERWRITING AGENCY, LTD., TANYA ROSE, CHRISTIAN KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
CARDONA v. FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2017cv02407
Plaintiff:
KELLIE CARDONA
Defendant:
FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BALAT v. KELLY et al
as 2:2017cv01431
Plaintiff:
SELAHATTIN BALAT
Defendant:
JOHN F. KELLY, JAMES B. COMEY, JR., LORI SCIALABBA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
