Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP et al v. SEIDNER et al
as 2:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP and THE WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP PENSION PLAN AND TRUST
Defendant:
MICHELLE T. SEIDNER , MARY DIXON LEVY and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
WHITE v. TEK COLLECT, INC.
as 2:2012cv06227
Plaintiff:
HAROLD WHITE
Defendant:
TEK COLLECT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WHITE v. PREMIERE CREDIT OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv04372
Plaintiff:
DENEEN M. WHITE
Defendant:
PREMIERE CREDIT OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CHEVEDDEN v. THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK et al
as 2:2012cv01488
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHEVEDDEN
Defendant:
THE PEP BOYS - MANNY, MOE & JACK, MICHAEL R. ODELL, ROBERT H. HOTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
DIPPLE v. ODELL et al
as 2:2012cv01415
Plaintiff:
EDWARD DIPPLE , LINDA DICKENS , JOHN CHEVEDDEN and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. ODELL , ROBERT H. HOTZ , IRVIN D. REID and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
ASTOR REALTY TRUST et al v. ODELL et al
as 2:2012cv01417
Plaintiff:
ASTOR BK REALTY TRUST and LINDA DICKENS
Defendant:
MICHAEL R. ODELL, JANE SCACCETTI, JOHN T. SWEETWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
WHITE v. WACHOVIA/WELLS FARGO BANK
as 2:2011cv07774
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. WHITE
Defendant:
WACHOVIA/WELLS FARGO BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
