Cases 41 - 50 of 19,488
MEDEROS PARRY et al v. TRANS UNION, LLC
as 2:2024cv01341
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ROBERT MEDEROS PARRY and BRANDON JOSEPH MEDEROS PARRY
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
STAFFORD v. THE PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2024cv02188
Plaintiff:
TERELL STAFFORD
Defendant:
ENCORE SERIES INC. doing business as THE PHILLY POPS, THE PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION, THE PHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA AND KIMMEL CENTER INC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
TESTANI et al v. DEMENTIA SOCIETY INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02193
Plaintiff:
SUSAN TESTANI, RONA BROWN and JOY SULLIVAN
Defendant:
DEMENTIA SOCIETY INC. doing business as DEMENTIA SOCIETY OF AMERICA and KEVIN JAMESON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SHELTON v. JOHN DOE ENTITY IDENTIFIED AS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) COMPLIANCE SERVICES
as 2:2024cv02140
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. SHELTON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE ENTITY IDENTIFIED AS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) COMPLIANCE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
