Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WRIGHT v. EBY, LLC
as 2:2023cv02921
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE WRIGHT
Defendant:
EBY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. WOODS
as 2:2021mc00065
Receiver:
A. COTTEN WRIGHT
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
JOHN J. WOODS
Justice, II v. AMERICAN RIVER BANKSHARES et al
as 2:2021cv03125
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Defendant:
AMERICAN RIVER BANKSHARES, CHARLES D FITE, WILLIAM A ROBOTHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
HOPKINS v. PREMIER FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02735
Defendant:
THOMAS W WRIGHT, DOUGLAS V REYNOLDS, TONEY K ADKINS and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. AEGION CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv01914
Defendant:
AEGION CORPORATION, WALTER J GALVIN, STEPHEN P CORTINOVIS and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
THRIVEST SPECIALTY FUNDING, LLC v. WRIGHT
as 2:2018cv04764
Respondent:
TOBY L. WRIGHT
Petitioner:
THRIVEST SPECIALTY FUNDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0007
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03699
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
HENDERSON et al v. EMORY UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2018mc00152
Defendant:
EMORY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, RONNIE JOWERS, PETER BARNES and others
Petitioner:
VANGUARD GROUP, INC. and THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
CONNIE CORPENING, HUBERTA W WALLER, CYNTHIA T. JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
WRIGHT v. TRANS UNION, LLC
as 2:2018cv02051
Plaintiff:
MARJORIE LOU WRIGHT
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
