Cases 1 - 10 of 37
ANDERSON v. BARITZ et al
as 2:2024cv02095
Plaintiff:
EVA ANDERSON
Defendant:
KENNETH L. BARITZ, BARITZ LAW ASSOCIATES LLC and PMC PROPERTY GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023mc00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
RUBINSTEIN et al v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2022cv04774
Plaintiff:
ERAN RUBINSTEIN and SUSAN M. BOLTZ-RUBINSTEIN
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ARCH CAPITAL GROUP (US) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ANDERSON v. CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv03473
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANDERSON
Defendant:
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
Justice, II v. AMERICAN RIVER BANKSHARES et al
as 2:2021cv03125
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Defendant:
AMERICAN RIVER BANKSHARES, CHARLES D FITE, WILLIAM A ROBOTHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WAITS v. GLU MOBILE INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01738
Defendant:
GLU MOBILE INC., HANY NADA, GREG BRANDEAU and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC WAITS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05226
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ANDERSON v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00702
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC.
Plaintiff:
TAJAH MALIKA ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ANDERSON v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04821
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
SAMONE U. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
