Cases 1 - 10 of 11
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST, GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ROBERSON et al v. HEALTH CAREER INSTITUTE LLC et al
as 2:2023mc00147
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY ROBERSON, REBECCA FREEMAN, BIANCA VIAS and others
Defendant:
HEALTH CAREER INSTITUTE LLC, FLORIAN EDUCATION INVESTORS LLC and STEVEN HART
Respondent:
Lighthouse Services LLC
WATERMAN v. EMCLAIRE FINANCIAL CORP et al
as 2:2022cv02230
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
EMCLAIRE FINANCIAL CORP, WILLIAM C MARSH, DAVID L. COX and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
FREEMAN v. GREEN
as 2:2020cv00400
Defendant:
GEORGE MICHEAL GREEN
Plaintiff:
NATAYA FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FREEMAN, JR. v. EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2019cv05699
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH L. FREEMAN, JR.
Defendant:
EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
COVENANT PARTNERS, L.P. et al v. FRETZ et al
as 2:2017mc00052
Plaintiff:
GARY F. SEITZ
Defendant:
WILLIAM B. FRETZ, JR. and JOHN P. FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Type:
Other Statutes
FREEMAN v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
as 2:2016cv01929
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
Plaintiff:
FREEMAN and RHONDA FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FREEMAN v. MOYIHAN et al
as 2:2012cv05364
Plaintiff:
RHONDA FREEMAN
Defendant:
BRIAN T. MOYIHAN , CHARLES H. NOSKI , BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
