Cases 1 - 10 of 59
LIBERTY LICENSING & CONSULTING, LLC v. JEWELED ROSE'S CONSULTING, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY LICENSING & CONSULTING, LLC
Defendant:
JEWELED ROSE'S CONSULTING, LLC, LAUREN R. PHILPOTT and ASHLEY REYES
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. OLYMPIA EARLY LEARNING CENTER et al
as 2:2023mc00149
Plaintiff:
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
OLYMPIA EARLY LEARNING CENTER, STEVE OLSON and ROSE HORGDAHL
Petitioner:
CYNTHIA LASPROGATA
Counter Claimant:
ALICIA MENDOZA, G.S.J., AMANDA MYRICK and others
GOODLIN v. ROSE et al
as 2:2023cv02304
Plaintiff:
HERBERT SETH GOODLIN
Defendant:
ALEX ROSE, delaware county daily times, FOLCROFT BOROUGH DETECTIVE CORPORAL DANIEL E. WHITE, OFFICIALLY AND IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITFIELD v. CONERSTONE BUILDING BRANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01547
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
CONERSTONE BUILDING BRANDS, INC., JAMES S METCALF, ROSE LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JUSTICE, II v. CLOUDERA, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03498
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
CLOUDERA, INC., ROBERT BEARDEN, PAUL CORMIER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
ROSE TREE MEDIA SCHOOL DISTRICT v. C.D. et al
as 2:2019cv04623
Defendant:
W.D., C.D. and D.D.
Plaintiff:
ROSE TREE MEDIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
NEWELL v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2019cv00459
Defendant:
SANDRA K. JOHNSON, EMMET KAMARA, MIND & MANNERS LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOUREY NEWELL
PERRONG v. TRANZVIA, LLC ("TRANZVIA") et al
as 2:2017cv03664
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant:
AARIS HOLDINGS, INC. ("AARIS"), GORDON ROSE and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
